Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
ALM, publisher of Law Journal Newsletters has named Bill Carter its president and chief executive officer.
Carter, 44, is a veteran of the legal information services industry. He was most recently a senior vice president at Thomson Reuters, where for two years he led the Small Law Business Unit. In that role, Carter oversaw services for law firms of 1 to 29 attorneys, including publications, software and legal research products.
Carter has also been a senior executive at LexisNexis, legal technology company Epiq Systems, consulting firm Gerson Lehrman Group, and events and marketing firm GES Exposition Services. From 1997 to 1999, he was a consultant with Bain & Co.
Charles Siegel, ALM's nonexecutive chairman, said Carter's varied experience positions him well to lead the company, which provides news and business information to the legal and real estate industries.
'Bill has a rich blend of strategic and operational skills that make him the ideal candidate for ALM,' Siegel said. 'His leadership experiences in business serving our markets, especially with digital transformations, product development and value creation, will help accelerate ALM's further growth and profitability. His sharp focus on the customer will be the framework for us going into the future.'
Carter has a master's degree in business from The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, a master's degree in computer science from Georgia Institute of Technology and a bachelor's degree in computer science from Tulane University.
Carter said ALM will continue its migration toward digital platforms to serve a customer base that has been expanding its online and mobile capabilities.
'ALM is one of the most highly regarded business franchises in the U.S legal industry, producing and distributing unique, must-have information, news and reference content,' Carter said. 'I'm excited to assume the leadership of a media company that has transformed into a digitally focused enterprise providing value-added business information to its customers, and I look forward to working with the talented team of professionals at ALM to continue to drive strong growth of the company going forward.'
Carter replaces William Pollak, who served as president and chief executive officer from 1998 until last month.
ALM, publisher of Law Journal Newsletters has named Bill Carter its president and chief executive officer.
Carter, 44, is a veteran of the legal information services industry. He was most recently a senior vice president at Thomson Reuters, where for two years he led the Small Law Business Unit. In that role, Carter oversaw services for law firms of 1 to 29 attorneys, including publications, software and legal research products.
Carter has also been a senior executive at
Charles Siegel, ALM's nonexecutive chairman, said Carter's varied experience positions him well to lead the company, which provides news and business information to the legal and real estate industries.
'Bill has a rich blend of strategic and operational skills that make him the ideal candidate for ALM,' Siegel said. 'His leadership experiences in business serving our markets, especially with digital transformations, product development and value creation, will help accelerate ALM's further growth and profitability. His sharp focus on the customer will be the framework for us going into the future.'
Carter has a master's degree in business from The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, a master's degree in computer science from Georgia Institute of Technology and a bachelor's degree in computer science from Tulane University.
Carter said ALM will continue its migration toward digital platforms to serve a customer base that has been expanding its online and mobile capabilities.
'ALM is one of the most highly regarded business franchises in the U.S legal industry, producing and distributing unique, must-have information, news and reference content,' Carter said. 'I'm excited to assume the leadership of a media company that has transformed into a digitally focused enterprise providing value-added business information to its customers, and I look forward to working with the talented team of professionals at ALM to continue to drive strong growth of the company going forward.'
Carter replaces William Pollak, who served as president and chief executive officer from 1998 until last month.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.