Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Enforcing Divorce Agreements

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
March 29, 2012

All New York legal practitioners are aware (or they should be) that an action for a breach of contract is subject to a six-year statute of limitations pursuant to the CPLR Section 213. Similarly, an action based upon mistake is also subject to a six-year statute of limitations. CPLR Section 213 (6).

That said, one would think that if one of the parties in a divorce action were to breach a separation agreement or a stipulation of settlement subsequent to the parties' divorce, such a proceeding would similarly be governed by the six-year statute of limitations applicable to breach of contract actions. After all, the Court of Appeals has treated separation agreements and stipulations of settlement as contracts, stating in the seminal case of Boden v. Boden that “the terms [contained in a separation agreement or stipulation of settlement], like other contract clauses, are binding on the parties to the agreement.” Boden v. Boden, 42 NY2d 210 (1977).

Read These Next
Law Firms are Reducing Redundant Real Estate by Bringing Support Services Back to the Office Image

A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Bit Parts Image

Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights

Risks of “Baseball Arbitration” in Resolving Real Estate Disputes Image

“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.

Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel Image

'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.