Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Traditionally, defendants in actions brought by debtors or trustees have struggled to level the playing field and extricate themselves from the bankruptcy court, a forum often perceived as the plaintiff's “home court.” At one time, litigants hoped to utilize motions to withdraw the reference from the bankruptcy court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 157(d), to enhance their prospects of a favorable resolution from a presumably friendlier judicial forum. However, more often than not, movants were disappointed by the district courts' natural reluctance to relieve the bankruptcy courts of their intended role and increase their own considerable workloads.
The Supreme Court's recent ruling in Stern v. Marshall has revitalized this litigation tactic and encouraged a veritable torrent of such motions. In In re Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (Madoff) alone, a liquidation proceeding under the Securities Investor Protection Act currently pending before the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, literally hundreds of such motions have been filed in the fraudulent transfer actions commenced by the trustee. District Judge Jed S. Rakoff has issued several orders withdrawing the reference, not with respect to the adversary proceedings in their entirety, and not even with respect to individual claims, but with respect to discrete issues underlying those claims (including the effect of Stern v. Marshall on the bankruptcy court's ability to hear and adjudicate avoidance claims).
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
As consumers continue to shift purchasing and consumption habits in the aftermath of the pandemic, manufacturers are increasingly reliant on third-party logistics and warehousing to ensure their products timely reach the market.