Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Michael Roster has been a vocal advocate for re-thinking the management and philosophy of running a legal department for many years. He began developing his innovative strategies while serving as a partner at Morrison & Foerster, managing the firm's Los Angeles office and serving on its policy committee.
He was able to put these ideas into practice in 1993 upon being named General Counsel of Stanford University, Stanford Medical Center and Stanford Management Company. Well before the idea was even close to fashionable, Roster moved nearly all of Stanford's outside legal work to a handful of law firms working on fixed price retainers for both counseling and litigation. But more than just an initiating an economic strategy, Roster integrated these attorneys into the fabric of the legal department to create a value-based relationship that incorporated his vision of how to maximize efficiency and function. He supplied Stanford's outside firms with on-site offices so the attorneys could attend the weekly staff meetings. In addition, these attorneys were listed in the telephone directories as though they were formal members of the law department staff. In short, outside counsel were embraced as part of the team instead of keeping them at arm's length.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
A common question that commercial landlords and tenants face is which of them is responsible for a repair to the subject premises. These disputes often center on whether the repair is "structural" or "nonstructural."