Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Daubert requires that federal district court judges engage in a two-prong inquiry when addressing the admissibility of expert testimony. The district court must determine that an expert's proffered testimony has both a reliable foundation and an adequate fit. While many courts have addressed in-depth the first prong of this Daubert test, less attention has been paid to the second prong, the “fit” requirement. Among the courts that have engaged in a substantive “fit” analysis, the majority have focused on whether the expert's proffered testimony is sufficiently tied to the facts of the case or the issues presented to the trier of fact. Under this type of analysis, the courts essentially ask the question “is this testimony relevant?”
Three federal circuits discuss an alternative approach to the “fit” analysis and hold that there is an independent significance to the “fit” requirement. Specifically, these circuits hold that the “fit” requirement is satisfied when an expert's opinion is supported by the underlying data and have precluded expert opinions where there was too great an analytical gap between the data and the opinion proffered.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. Tempnology, LLC The question is whether a debtor's rejection of its agreement granting a license "terminates rights of the licensee that would survive the licensor's breach under applicable nonbankruptcy law."