Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The FASB and IASB Boards met on June 13, 2012 in London and made key decisions on lessee and lessor accounting in their Lease Project. Although they finally decided all leases are not alike, they made a split decision as to how to classify them based on type of asset leased. The decision is bad news for most equipment lessees and possibly bad for lessors, with the only good news being for real estate lessees.
This was the last major decision-making meeting (there was one more meeting in July 2012) that was holding up drafting of the new Exposure Draft (“ED”). The timeline for the project is:
Although the Boards were split with the FASB favoring a two-lease model and the IASB favoring a one-lease model, they took a second vote on whether compromise was possible to get a converged standard. In the second vote the majority agreed they could compromise on a two-lease model approach for both lessees and lessors with the same dividing line to determine which accounting approach to use. The ELFA and I have been advocating a two-lease approach since the outset of the Lease Project in 2006. It is a bit ironic that after six years they are virtually back to using current GAAP with operating leases capitalized, but with a set of new complex classification tests that are different for real estate and equipment. It appears that there is a lack of consistent treatment that should not be if the standard is principles based. Both equipment and real estate leases have the same legal treatment ' they are not considered loans from a legal perspective.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.