Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
“Self-help,” in a leasing context, typically refers to the landlord's traditional remedy of locking out the defaulting tenant and taking back the premises without going through the judicial system. Historically, under the common law, a landlord was free to choose its remedies against a defaulting tenant with few limitations, including the liberal use of self-help. However, modern jurisprudence provides tenants with much greater protection from eviction and also seeks to prevent possible violent landlord-tenant confrontations. Therefore, the majority of states have now abolished the traditional rule of self-help, and permit landlords to evict tenants only through court proceedings. In connection with the move away from self-help, most states have established summary eviction proceedings which, in theory, provide landlords with a more efficient and expedient method of retaking possession than traditional civil litigation.
Even with respect to those states that continue to recognize a landlord's right to self-help, many attorneys are very reluctant to recommend this remedy for their landlord clients, given: 1) the exposure for significant liability to the tenant if the tenant has a valid defense to the alleged default; 2) the availability of summary ejectment proceedings; and 3) the often correct perception that courts take a dim or outright hostile view toward self-help. Further, in the minority of states that still permit a landlord to exercise self-help, the remedy is often limited to commercial landlords, as residential tenants are afforded much greater protection. For the commercial landlord or tenant, this article focuses on the widely differing treatment of self-help ' using the respective laws in the neighboring jurisdictions of Maryland, Virginia and the District of Columbia as illustrative of these differences.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.