Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Second Circuit Speaks on Color Marks and the Aesthetic Functionality Doctrine
It is not often when fashion and style blogs cover federal court decisions, but the fashion world currently is abuzz with the Second Circuit's recently issued decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. Yves Saint Laurent America Holdings, Inc., No. 11-3303-cv, 2012 WL 3832285 (2d Cir. Sept. 5, 2012). As the courts involved in this case have noted, Christian Louboutin's red-soled shoes have become ubiquitous on red carpets and in fashion circles as high-style, high-priced footwear that are immediately associated with Louboutin. So much so, that in 2008, the USPTO granted Louboutin a federal registration for a red, lacquered sole on footwear (the “Red Sole Mark”).
The controversy over the Red Sole Mark began in early 2011, when Louboutin discovered that Yves Saint Laurent (“YSL”), a venerable French fashion house also known for high-style, high-priced footwear and apparel, was preparing to market a line of monochromatic shoes in various colors, including red. Louboutin filed suit in the Southern District of New York, seeking a preliminary injunction preventing YSL from marketing or selling its red monochromatic shoes that also featured red soles. Although the case immediately sparked the interest of the fashion industry, clamoring to watch two fashion giants duke it out in court, intellectual property scholars and practitioners also took note of the novel issues presented in the case. Though perhaps for different reasons, all observers eagerly awaited the Second Circuit's decision determining whether Louboutin could indeed prevent others from using the color red on footwear soles.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Judge Rules Shaquille O'Neal Will Face Securities Lawsuit for Promotion, Sale of NFTs
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Blockchain Domains: New Developments for Brand Owners
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
Supreme Court Rules Rejection of Trademark License Does Not Rescind Rights of Licensee
Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. Tempnology, LLC The question is whether a debtor's rejection of its agreement granting a license "terminates rights of the licensee that would survive the licensor's breach under applicable nonbankruptcy law."