Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In the many years I have worked with law firms on the design and development of their websites, inevitably someone asks, “So, how long is this going to take?” Most often, this question is followed by an overly ambitious date from someone at the firm as to when they would like to have their new site up. More often than not, that date is simply unrealistic and while someone informs them of that, they never quite seem to hear the real answer to the original question.
So, why is there this disconnection? Why do law firms assume that one of their most important marketing communications tools can simply be designed and developed in a few short months? Effective websites take foresight and strategy. I'm not talking about solo practitioners and small local firms that can easily get by with the use of a creative website template. I'm referring to those midsized law firms with 50-plus attorneys that have a more sophisticated buyer of legal services as clients, principally in-house counsel and business owners. This audience of law firm clients are busy people and they are coming to your website because they have a problem that they need to have solved. They want their problem fixed effectively and efficiently, and they want to find the right person with demonstrable experience to handle their issue. Law firms with websites that appropriately and strategically distinguish themselves from their competitors are quickly learning that they gain an edge when they take the time to thoughtfully redesign and update their websites.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.