Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A recurring issue in intellectual property law is the possibility of establishing rights in subject matter from the public domain and drawing the boundaries between what is public and private. In one guise, this issue is now before the Supreme Court in Assoc. for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., No. 12-398, cert. granted, Nov. 30, 2012) (patent eligibility of isolated DNA). Earlier this year the issue arose in another guise in Golan v. Holder, 132 S.Ct. 873 (2012), which upheld the constitutionality of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (or, informally, Copyright Restoration Act), granting U.S. copyright protection to certain works that had passed into the public domain in the United States, but which were still protected in their country of origin. In doing so, however, the Court construed the scope and significance of the public domain in a manner at odds with prior Supreme Court jurisprudence and in a manner that could have lasting significance for maintenance of trademark rights in subject matter within the scope of patent or copyright.
In Golan, various orchestra conductors, musicians, publishers, and others who had enjoyed unfettered access to certain such works in the public domain filed suit, objecting that Congress, in enacting the Copyright Restoration Act, exceeded its authority under the Copyright and Patent Clause and under the First Amendment. The Copyright Restoration Act restored rights in works that passed into the public domain for any of three basic reasons: the United States did not protect works from the country of origin at the time of first publication abroad; the United States did not protect sound recordings fixed before 1972; or the author failed to comply with U.S. statutory formalities. When the United States joined Berne in 1989, it did not protect such foreign works that had fallen into the public domain here. In 1994, however, TRIPS required implementation of Berne's first 21 articles, including protection of works of other member states where copyright had not expired in the country of origin.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.