Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Staffing Agencies May Be Held Vicariously Liable for Doctors' Mistakes
In New Jersey, companies that provide medical staff to healthcare facilities may find themselves vicariously liable for medical malpractice damages if mistakes occur, even if they consider the medical personnel they have placed to be independent contractors. This is what a New Jersey appeals court said Oct. 11 when it reinstated a claim brought in Monk v. Emergency Physician Assocs., A-489-11, by the widow of a patient who died at Virtua/West Jersey Hospital after allegedly being given an overdose of the painkiller Dilaudid there. The doctor accused of this negligence, Joseph O'Connell, was provided to the hospital through Emergency Physician Associates (EPA), a Woodbury, NJ, company that staffed the hospital's emergency room. The trial court granted summary judgment to EPA after concluding that Dr. O'Connell was merely an independent contractor of the company. The Appellate Division disagreed, finding that the facts that EPA termed O'Connell an “independent contractor” in its contracts and did not withhold income taxes or pay unemployment taxes for him were not dispositive on the issue of agency. Several other things rendered him an “employee” of EPA, the court found, including these: EPA could terminate O'Connell's contract for cause; EPA paid O'Connell an hourly rate and was to give him bonuses for certain things; EPA paid O'Connell's medical malpractice insurance premiums; EPA handled patient billing for O'Connell, using his name and then paying him from the proceeds; and EPA provided the hospital with its chief medical director of emergency medical services, who was authorized to act on EPA's behalf and to manage the E.R's daily operations. The appeals court also found that the nature-of-the-work test for determining employee status was satisfied because O'Connell's income depended on EPA, his work was integral to the company and EPA had an ongoing contractual and business relationship with him and with its other doctors.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
A common question that commercial landlords and tenants face is which of them is responsible for a repair to the subject premises. These disputes often center on whether the repair is "structural" or "nonstructural."