Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
NEW JERSEY
Three-Week 'Legal Holiday'-Like Filing Deadline Extension Declared
In response to Hurricane Sandy's devastating impact on New Jersey, the state Supreme Court issued a tolling order allowing more time for State litigants to meet filing deadlines. On Nov. 9, 2012, Chief Justice Stuart Rabner issued an order that said the span from Oct. 29 ' the day the storm hit ' through Nov. 16 “shall be deemed the same as legal holidays.” Rabner's order “consolidates, extends and supersedes” three orders the high court had issued on Nov. 1, 2 and 5, 2012, that had pushed back filing deadlines only to the date of issuance and only in those counties most affected by the storm.
Parenting Coordinator Pilot Program Discontinued
New Jersey's Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) has discontinued its five-year-old Parenting Coordinator Pilot Program, concluding that it was unsuccessful. “We couldn't find any level of satisfaction” with the program, said the AOC's assistant director of family services, Harry Cassidy. According to Cassidy, the parents who needed a parenting coordinator's assistance were generally unwilling to accept that help. “In order for the program to be successful, both parties must be willing to engage with each other and engage with the parenting coordinator. We were not finding that,” he said. While the standardized forms approved for the program are now no longer in use, and the list of approved parent coordinators is being removed from official websites, courts will continue to have discretion to appoint a parenting coordinator on motion, or when both parents consent.
High Court Considers Limits on Jury's Private Viewing of Taped Testimony
New Jersey's Supreme Court is currently considering whether a judge's decision to allow jury members to view videotaped testimony outside the presence of the judge and counsel was error. The defendant in the case, State v. A.R., A-63-11, had his conviction for sexually abusing his wife's nine-year-old niece overturned based on unsupervised jury viewing of videotaped testimony. The state is asking the court to reinstate the conviction.
CONNECTICUT
Lawyers Working for Domestic Assault Defendant Want Out
The Moynahan Law Firm of Waterbury, CT, has twice been rebuffed in its effort to receive judicial approval to discontinue representing John Michael Farren, but they have not given up. Farren, a former Bush administration lawyer, is accused of assaulting and seriously injuring his wife, Mary Margaret Farren, allegedly because he was angered when she served him with divorce papers. Mrs. Farren has filed a civil lawsuit against her husband and is seeking $30 million in damages. In connection with that suit, $4.1 million in Farren's assets have been attached, leaving him without funds to pay his legal representatives, according to his attorney. “As a result of the divorce, he gets 25% of the house,” said Timothy C. Moynahan, of the Moynahan Law Firm. “If he could liquidate that, that would be $750,000 to $800,000, but the prejudgment remedy in civil court has removed that from his access.” Moynahan argues that because his client does not have access to money to pay for his criminal defense, he is constitutionally entitled to receive the services of a public defender.
NEW JERSEY
Three-Week 'Legal Holiday'-Like Filing Deadline Extension Declared
In response to Hurricane Sandy's devastating impact on New Jersey, the state Supreme Court issued a tolling order allowing more time for State litigants to meet filing deadlines. On Nov. 9, 2012, Chief Justice
Parenting Coordinator Pilot Program Discontinued
New Jersey's Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) has discontinued its five-year-old Parenting Coordinator Pilot Program, concluding that it was unsuccessful. “We couldn't find any level of satisfaction” with the program, said the AOC's assistant director of family services, Harry Cassidy. According to Cassidy, the parents who needed a parenting coordinator's assistance were generally unwilling to accept that help. “In order for the program to be successful, both parties must be willing to engage with each other and engage with the parenting coordinator. We were not finding that,” he said. While the standardized forms approved for the program are now no longer in use, and the list of approved parent coordinators is being removed from official websites, courts will continue to have discretion to appoint a parenting coordinator on motion, or when both parents consent.
High Court Considers Limits on Jury's Private Viewing of Taped Testimony
New Jersey's Supreme Court is currently considering whether a judge's decision to allow jury members to view videotaped testimony outside the presence of the judge and counsel was error. The defendant in the case, State v. A.R., A-63-11, had his conviction for sexually abusing his wife's nine-year-old niece overturned based on unsupervised jury viewing of videotaped testimony. The state is asking the court to reinstate the conviction.
CONNECTICUT
Lawyers Working for Domestic Assault Defendant Want Out
The Moynahan Law Firm of Waterbury, CT, has twice been rebuffed in its effort to receive judicial approval to discontinue representing John Michael Farren, but they have not given up. Farren, a former Bush administration lawyer, is accused of assaulting and seriously injuring his wife, Mary Margaret Farren, allegedly because he was angered when she served him with divorce papers. Mrs. Farren has filed a civil lawsuit against her husband and is seeking $30 million in damages. In connection with that suit, $4.1 million in Farren's assets have been attached, leaving him without funds to pay his legal representatives, according to his attorney. “As a result of the divorce, he gets 25% of the house,” said Timothy C. Moynahan, of the Moynahan Law Firm. “If he could liquidate that, that would be $750,000 to $800,000, but the prejudgment remedy in civil court has removed that from his access.” Moynahan argues that because his client does not have access to money to pay for his criminal defense, he is constitutionally entitled to receive the services of a public defender.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.