Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Appeals Court: Mother Abused Child by Taking Prescribed Medication
A New Jersey appellate court has determined that an expectant mother who takes doctor-prescribed methadone during her pregnancy can legally be held responsible for child abuse in that state for exposing her unborn child to a dangerous and addictive drug. DYFS v. Y.N., A-5880-11. The case brings up several questions, including these: Should an unborn child's welfare be protected over a pregnant woman's health, and what duty does a physician owe to his patient's fetus? In the New Jersey case, the woman had been advised that her use of methadone could harm her unborn child, but she chose to go ahead with the treatment. Her baby was born with symptoms of methadone withdrawal and had to be treated with morphine for 39 days following his birth. The appeals panel focused its inquiry solely on the child's welfare and was unswayed by the fact that the mother was taking methadone under the care of a licensed medical care provider who prescribed the drug to her to wean her off of heroin and cocaine. It distinguished a 2012 case in which a mother who was somewhat impaired due to the use of Xanax during her pregnancy was not found guilty of child abuse. The difference, said the court, was that the child born with Xanax in its system was not addicted to the drug, while the child in' DYFS v. Y.N. was born addicted to methadone.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
As consumers continue to shift purchasing and consumption habits in the aftermath of the pandemic, manufacturers are increasingly reliant on third-party logistics and warehousing to ensure their products timely reach the market.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.