Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Appeals by the Numbers
Two of the main substantive causes for refusals of U.S. federal trademark applications are descriptiveness refusals (under Section 2(e) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. '1052(e)(1)) and likelihood of confusion refusals (under Section 2(d) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. '1052(d)). The U.S. Patent & Trademark Office's examiners and the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board's judges, who review ex parte appeals from examiners' final refusals to register pending applications, apply very different standards as 'tiebreakers' when the evidence and arguments submitted by the applicant against the two types of refusals create doubt about the appropriate outcome.
Any reasonable doubt as to whether a mark is merely descriptive or contains any suggestive element must be resolved in favor of the applicant. The rule grew out of Section 2(e)(1) refusals of merely descriptive marks, see, e.g., In re Aid Laboratories, Inc., 221 USPQ 1215 (TTAB 1983), In re MVP Group Int'l, Ser. No. 85074276 (TTAB May 16, 2012), and also applies to applies to 2(e)(2) refusals that the mark is primarily merely geographically descriptive,'see, e.g., In re International Taste Inc., 53 USPQ2d 1604, 1605-06 (TTAB 2000), and to 2(e)(4) that the mark is primarily merely a surname, see, e.g., In re Yeley, 85 USPQ2d 1150, 1151 (TTAB 2007); In re Benthin Mgmt. GmbH, 37 USPQ2d 1332, 1333-1334 (TTAB 1995). The standard of proof does not apply to Section 2(e)(3) refusals that a mark is primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive or to 2(e)(5) refusals that the matter applied for is functional.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Judge Rules Shaquille O'Neal Will Face Securities Lawsuit for Promotion, Sale of NFTs
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Blockchain Domains: New Developments for Brand Owners
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
Supreme Court Rules Rejection of Trademark License Does Not Rescind Rights of Licensee
Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. Tempnology, LLC The question is whether a debtor's rejection of its agreement granting a license "terminates rights of the licensee that would survive the licensor's breach under applicable nonbankruptcy law."