Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Content Rights Rulings on Presumptive Evidentiary Weight and on Burden of Proof
Two recent court rulings involving the entertainment industry considered evidentiary roles in disputes over enforcing rights from underlying copyrights. In one case, the estate of pianist Oscar Peterson and New York City Birdland club owner John Valenti sued Valenti's former live-in companion Hilary Kole, who worked as a singer at Birdland. The plaintiffs claim Kole infringed their copyrights in recordings made by Peterson and Kole that Kole permitted an Internet radio site to stream. The estate filed copyright registrations for the final studio mixes, while Kole claims copyrights in the unedited studio recordings. Section 410(c) of the Copyright Act gives prima facie proof of ownership to copyright registrations made within five years of publication. Sending the case to trial, Judge Jed S. Rakoff of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York noted: “Given that the two registrations were obtained just five weeks apart and in clear contemplation of this litigation, the Court concludes that any evidentiary weight that might be due one registration is counterbalanced by the other, leaving no presumption on either side.” Peterson v. Kolodin, 13 Civ. 793. In the other case, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit sent to trial a dispute over the validity of licensing rights to early Bob Marley recordings. Rock River Communications, which obtained a non-exclusive license from San Juan Music Group, sued Universal Music Group (UMG), which claims an exclusive license in the recordings. The cause of action at issue against UMG alleges intentional interference with Rock River's prospective economic advantage. The appeals court decided that defendant UMG must prove Rock River's license from San Juan Music is invalid. The court noted: “UMG cannot obtain summary judgment based on the holes in Rock River's claim to a valid license when the validity of UMG's own licensing rights is equally spotty.” Rock River Communications Inc. v. Universal Music Group, 11-57168
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.