Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A father and his four-year-old son are walking out of the father's house in a small town in North Carolina. The father has his suitcase in his right hand and two passports clutched between his fingers. With his other hand he pulls his son along, who is in turn pulling his own small wheeled suitcase behind him. Suddenly, two sheriff's deputies approach the pair and inform the father (quietly, so his son does not hear) that, although he is not under arrest, his son is being removed from him and placed in the state's care pending a hearing regarding the custody dispute between him and his ex-wife.
The father protests, knowing that his ex-wife does not live in North Carolina, that the most recent child-custody determination was entered by a New Jersey court, and believing that he must be entitled to a hearing before his son can be removed from him. The deputies then serve the father with a Warrant to Take Physical Custody of a Child, and secure the child into a car seat. As they are driving away, the father yells after them, asking where his son will be. The deputies tell him that the information is on the warrant. When the father reads the warrant, he sees a reference to the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act. The father also sees that a hearing is set for the next day and that, to his dismay, he will have to pay his ex-wife's attorney's fees, travel expenses, and child care costs if he loses.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.