Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Bit Parts

Band Is Allowed to Self-Release Album During Contract Battle with Victory Records

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois declined to issue a preliminary injunction that would have barred the band A Day to Remember (ADTR) from self-releasing an album during the music group's litigation with Victory Records. Woodard v. Victory Records Inc., 11-cv-7594. ADTR had sued claiming the definition of “album” in its 2006 contract with Victory included re-releases that contained bonus tracks. Victory counterclaimed, alleging contract breach and sought to bar ADTR from independently distributing the group's latest album Common Courtesy. District Judge John Z. Lee observed “the record currently before the Court supports Victory's [album delivery] construction at least as equally, if not more so, than that offered by ADTR.” Victory further argued that its reputation could be irreparably harmed if ADTR self-released a substandard album. But in denying Victory's preliminary injunction motion, District Judge Lee noted: “Indeed, in this age of digital music distribution ', it can hardly be presumed that a 'self-released' recording by a music artist would be 'inferior' in terms of recording quality to one overseen by an established record company.” The district judge added: “As a pop band in a very competitive and fickle marketplace, it is likely that ADTR will experience a material erosion in popularity and fan support if it is prohibited from releasing a new record until the resolution of this case, which is likely many months away. ' This will not only harm ADTR, but also would detrimentally impact Victory's ability to benefit from ADTR's continued popularity in the event that it prevails in this action.”


Song License Non-Signatory Can Compel Arbitration

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Blockchain Domains: New Developments for Brand Owners Image

Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.

Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers Image

There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.