Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Corporate CounselorLJN NewslettersNewsSections

Patent Quality, Post-Grant Review, And the GAO Report on Patent Litigation

By Michael R. Fleming
November 30, 2013

One of the many elements of the sweeping America Invents Act of 2012 (AIA) was a directive to the Government Accountability Office (GAO) requesting a report on factors affecting patent litigation. In particular, the GAO was charged with assessing the extent to which so-called “patent trolls” were damaging patent litigation in the United States. This arose from concerns voiced by some that patent trolls, or non-practicing entities (NPEs), were buying patents on technology and software they had no intention of actually producing in order to bring nuisance suits against companies and others in an attempt to secure settlements and licensing agreements. Essentially, patent trolls were accused of abusing the patent system to build a revenue stream based on forcing companies to pay up or risk potentially expensive litigation.

The GAO released its report in August. Perhaps surprisingly, the GAO found that NPEs were not the main contributor to alleged problems with patent litigation in the United States. Instead, the GAO concluded that poor patent quality was to blame for most nuisance infringement suits. Its analysis showed that companies that make products brought most of the patent infringement lawsuits and that non-practicing entities brought only about 20% of all lawsuits. The GAO report also concluded that rather than focusing on the identity of the litigants, emphasis should be placed on improving the quality of issued patents and the examination process in order to strengthen the U.S. patent system. See the report at'http://1.usa.gov/17QD7Uw.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.

Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls Image

With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.