Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Bit Parts
Nashville Federal Court Finds Plausible Copyright Infringement Claim over “Remind Me” Phrase
The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Nashville Division, declined to grant a defense motion to dismiss, for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), a copyright infringement action filed by artist Lizza Connor over the Carrie Underwood/Brad Paisley hit recording “Remind Me.” Bowen v. Paisley, 13-cv-0414. Connor had previously written and publicly performed her song of the same name. The defendants include EMI April Music, Sony Music Entertainment, and Paisley's co-songwriters Charles Dubois and John Kelley Lovelace. District Judge Aleta A. Trauger noted of Sixth Circuit judicial practice: “Given that summary judgment motions premised on a developed record ' often with the benefit of expert testimony ' are to be granted 'sparingly,' it is not surprising that the defendants have identified only one case within this circuit in which a district court has granted a Rule 12 motion involving a copyright claim ' and that case is readily distinguishable.” After acknowledging that in Bridgeport Music Inc. v. UMG Recordings Inc., 585 F.3d 267 (6th Cir. 2009), the Sixth Circuit held that a repeated word or phrase can be the basis for infringement, District Judge Trauger found Connor “has plausibly shown that, taken in combination, the lyrics and associated melodies, intonations, and usage could be sufficiently original to constitute protectable material.” Specifically, Judge Trauger observed that in both Connor's demo of her song and the Paisley/Underwood recording, “(1) the phrase 'Remind me' is often followed by the partner phrase 'Baby, remind Me,' which essentially echoes the hook; (2) the hooks are repeated in close proximity and with similar intonation ' higher the second time than the first; (3) the hooks rise in pitch from 're-' to '-mind' and descend in pitch from 're-' to '-mind,'; and (4) the syllable 're-' crosses two tones and the syllable '-me' crosses at least three tones.”
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
A Lawyer's System for Active Reading
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.