Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Since the 2008 economic downturn, the U.S. legal market has undergone a permanent restructuring. With huge firms collapsing due to crippling debt, we see that legal services firms are no longer untouchable. The legal environment has become increasingly challenging as competition has increased, demand for legal services has remained flat, and firms are being forced to adopt more efficient, cost-effective and strategic business models. Further challenging legal services firms are: the visibility of public information about their capabilities, practices, clients and earnings; the drive towards commoditization of legal services; and the impact of globalization and cross-border mergers.
According to the “2013 Report on the State of the Legal Market” by The Center for the Study of the Legal Profession at the Georgetown University Law Center and Thomson Reuters Peer Monitor, firms will not stay profitable in the future without streamlining their business structures and improving operational efficiencies. See , http://bit.ly/191cxcT.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.