Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Does Section 109(a)'s requirement that “only a person that resides or has a domicile, a place of business, or property in the United States ' may be a debtor under this title” apply to foreign debtors in Chapter 15 proceedings? The Second Circuit Court of Appeals and the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware addressed this novel issue in December and came to opposite conclusions. In Drawbridge Special Opportunities Fund LP v. Barnet (In re Barnet), 737 F.3d 238 (2d Cir. 2013), the Second Circuit held that Section 109(a)'s eligibility requirements apply in Chapter 15 proceedings, and therefore vacated an order of recognition. Less than one week later, the Delaware Bankruptcy Court in In re Bemarmara Consulting a.s., Case No. 13-13037 (KG) (Bankr. D. Del. Dec. 17, 2013) (Transcript; “Tr.”) issued an oral ruling, holding that Section 109(a)'s requirements do not apply in Chapter 15 proceedings, and granting recognition to a debtor that an objector argued had no assets in the United States.
This article first sets forth the statutory provisions that led to the differing results in Barnet and Bemarmara and then explores the reasoning of the two opinions. It concludes with practical observations about the desirability and availability of Chapter 15 relief for companies without significant assets located in the United States.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.