Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Nearly all recalls of consumer products are “voluntary recalls,” meaning that a product manufacturer agrees to conduct the recall, and negotiates how it will be conducted, with the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), typically after a potential problem or concern comes to the company's attention. The CPSC is considering changes to this established approach that have significant implications for regulated businesses.
The CPSC has proposed an “interpretive rule” that would standardize voluntary recall notices. 78 Fed. Reg. 69,793 (Nov. 21, 2013). The proposal also makes corrective action plans that implement voluntary recalls legally binding, allows the Commission to mandate adoption of compliance programs as a result of a recall, and would limit a company's ability to avoid a recall being viewed as an admission of a defect in litigation. A 75-day comment period on the proposed rule concluded on Feb. 4.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
A common question that commercial landlords and tenants face is which of them is responsible for a repair to the subject premises. These disputes often center on whether the repair is "structural" or "nonstructural."