Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Television's old guard finally opened a hole in Aereo Inc.'s armor last month, winning a ruling that left the Internet TV upstart and its lawyers fighting to limit the damage ahead of arguments at the U.S. Supreme Court in April. District Judge Dale A. Kimball of the U.S. District for the District of Utah, in Salt Lake City, issued a sweeping decision that granted a bid by a group of broadcasters for a preliminary injunction blocking Aereo's service in Utah, Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Wyoming and Oklahoma. Community Television of Utah LLC v. Aereo Inc., 2:13CV910. Aereo's lawyers from Durie Tangri in San Francisco immediately sought to appeal the ruling to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit and asked District Judge Kimball to stay his decision in the meantime.
“I think [Kimball's ruling] destroys the myth that Aereo is invulnerable and invincible,” said Jenner & Block's Richard Stone, who represents Fox Broadcasting Company in the Utah case and before the Supreme Court. “It's useful for the Supreme Court to see yet another court step back and use a common sense approach.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
A common question that commercial landlords and tenants face is which of them is responsible for a repair to the subject premises. These disputes often center on whether the repair is "structural" or "nonstructural."