Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Mia Finsness recently joined Markel Global Insurance in Bermuda as the Manager of Excess Casualty Claims. Before joining Markel, Ms. Finsness was an attorney with Clyde & Co. in New York City, and began her career in the Insurance and Reinsurance Department of Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge.
More than 35 attorneys have formed a new insurance coverage law firm: Nicolaides Fink Thorpe Michaelides Sullivan LLP (Nicolaides LLP), with offices in Chicago, San Francisco and Los Angeles. Founding partners are Richard Nicolaides, Jr., Matthew Fink, Sara Thorpe, Barbara Michaelides and Monica Sullivan. The new practice is among the largest U.S. firms focused solely on representing the interests of global insurers, and one of the very few with a majority of female founding partners. The firm serves clients' needs in claims management, litigation and appeals, risk management and counseling, handling complex insurance disputes and arbitrations in the United States and abroad. For more information, visit www.nicolaidesllp.com.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.