Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Superstorm Sandy, which struck the East Coast in October 2012, is estimated to have caused $19 billion in private insurance losses and an additional $12-to-$15 billion in losses covered by the National Flood Insurance Program. In the immediate aftermath of the disaster, Governor Andrew Cuomo and Department of Financial Services Superintendent Ben Lawsky in New York, and Governor Chris Christie in New Jersey, promulgated a number of emergency measures that effectively rewrote insurance coverage in their states. This “stroke of the pen” altered existing policies in significant ways and put insurers on notice going forward that elected officials and regulators may respond to natural disasters by unilaterally and retroactively changing the rules of the game. Indeed, New York's Department of Financial Services (“NYDFS”) has stated as much in a recent circular letter describing the “post-disaster regulatory measures” it may take in the future, including a moratorium on policy cancellations and non-renewals and expedited handling of claims.
Aftermath of Sandy
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.