Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Copyright Infringement Damages Not Dischargeable in Bankruptcy
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Missouri decided that the managing member of a restaurant-bar who was found liable for failing to obtain a public performance license for the music played at the venue, couldn't discharge the copyright-infringement judgment through bankruptcy. In re: Walker, 11-52059-659. Doug Walker operated Twister's Iron Horse Saloon in Imperial, MO. After repeated unsuccessful attempts by ASCAP to get him to enter into a public performance license, the district court issued a default judgment against Walker for $41,231.90. Walker then filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy and moved to discharge the judgment under 11 U.S.C. '523(a)(6). The music publishing plaintiffs argued the judgment couldn't be discharged because the infringement was “willful and malicious.” ASCAP had tried to contact Walker 28 times by phone, 14 times by letters and twice by sending a representative to the saloon. Chief U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Kathy A. Surratt-States noted: “The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals [within which the Missouri bankruptcy court resides] has set a high bar for certainty of harm regarding willful and maliciousness for the purposes of Section 523(a)(6).” Chief Judge Surratt-States then found in part: “Debtor's failure to proactively obtain an ASCAP license, and then intentionally ignore ASCAP's several attempts to communicate with Debtor regarding the same, was willful. Debtor knew the consequences of his failure to obtain a license and failure to heed the several contacts by ASCAP ' that royalties due to authors of songs would not be paid ' would cause financial harm to both ASCAP and ASCAP's constituents generally, but Plaintiffs particularly. Debtor's actions were willful.”
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.