Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Although the reach of the federal government is impressive, all 50 states as well as Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and the District of Columbia have had for some time a powerful weapon in the form of the Uniform Act to Secure the Attendance of Witnesses from Without the State (Uniform Act) (available as adopted by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL) at http://bit.ly/1k6pLs3). Originally enacted in New York in 1936, it is used today to facilitate the issuance of extraterritorial or “cyber subpoenas,” with nationwide reach. For instance, these cyber subpoenas have been used to obtain a variety of records, from a request by a Georgia court for records of sealed matters in New York, to records of automobile manufacturers' confidential vehicle identification numbers used to trace stolen car parts, to casino card dealer observations, cash play, and computerized comps recorded by New Jersey casino establishments in a tax evasion case. See, generally, 11 U.L.A. ”1-8 (2014).
Cyber subpoenas have been used to obtain records maintained out-of-state by out-of-state witnesses. Both legitimate and illegitimate businesses require accurate and complete records of financial transactions to, among other reasons: balance the books; pay employees and suppliers; determine, pay or evade taxes; and insure the stability of an ongoing business. In a given criminal case, those records may prove guilt or establish a viable defense. For instance, the organized crime empire of Al Capone began to crumble with law enforcement obtaining and analyzing his business records. So it is foreseeable that when a business-related crime is involved, litigators for both the prosecution and defense seek to examine and inspect all the pertinent records. In the digital age, those records may be as mobile as the enterprise that created them. Obtaining the records of an enterprise may be the initial focus of significant intense litigation, and the methodology for obtaining those records is the subject of this article.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?