Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Sometimes, the U.S. Supreme Court surprises us with a decision that cuts across ideological lines and propels the Court out of the intellectual grotto in which it appeared to be dwelling. Such is Lawson v. FMR LLC, No. 12-3 (March 4, 2014), which could have significant consequences for law and accounting firms, as well as all businesses working with public companies.
In Lawson, the Court held by a six-to-three split that the anti-retaliation protections afforded whistleblowers under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) enacted in the aftermath of the Enron and WorldCom financial scandals apply to employees of contractors and subcontractors of publicly traded companies. Although SOX was enacted to provide greater regulatory oversight of public companies, the Lawson decision means that private companies could be subjected to whistleblower lawsuits. Law firms with public company clients could also face SOX lawsuits that could concern matters unrelated to the public companies.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.