Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Common Interest Doctrine and the Investigation of First-Party Claims
It is essential for parties to be able to determine with a high degree of certainty whether or not communication will be protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege or the work-product doctrine. As the Supreme Court observed, “an uncertain privilege ' is little better than no privilege at all.” Upjohn Co. v. United States, 449 U.S. 383, 393 (1981).
As we noted in an article earlier this year, a recent case in New York state court, National Union Fire Insurance Co. v. TransCanada Energy, USA, Nos. 650515/2010, 400759/2011, 2013 WL 4446917 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Aug. 15, 2013), aff'd 981 N.Y.S.2d 68, 69'70 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014), determined that the documents under review were not privileged, and went on to observe in dicta that the common interest doctrine would be inapplicable in a circumstance where there was no pending or reasonably anticipated litigation. That comment in TransCanada has the potential to raise uncertainty regarding the scope of protection in the context of the investigation and adjustment of insurance claims, while blurring the lines between attorney-client privilege, on the one hand, and work-product protection on the other. This article reviews the basic principles underlying each form of protection, addresses application of the common interest doctrine to those underlying protections, and discusses concepts key to the application of these protections and the common interest doctrine during the investigation of first-party insurance claims.
Law Firms are Reducing Redundant Real Estate by Bringing Support Services Back to the Office
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Bit Parts
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
Risks of “Baseball Arbitration” in Resolving Real Estate Disputes
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel
'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.