Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Ethics of Settlement: Restricting Plaintiff's Counsel from Representing Future Claimants
Your client, Mega Landlord, Inc., has reached an agreement to settle Plaintiffs' claims of alleged violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) and the parallel state statute relating to accessibility issues at Landlord's hotel in downtown Megatropolis. Both sides have devoted significant time and resources to the lawsuit: Thousands of pages of proprietary information has been produced by Landlord to Plaintiff's counsel under the terms of a protective order; witnesses have been deposed, and extensive briefing on the legal and factual issues has been submitted.
Landlord's CEO is happy with the decision to settle, but is worried that this costly litigation arises from nothing more than a personal vendetta by Plaintiff's lawyer, Sue Orbesood. He believes Ms. Orbesood intends to make a career out of suing Landlord for alleged ADA-related violations at all of its many properties ' as well as for violations of any other laws or regulations she can come up with now that she has extensive records relating to Landlord and the Megatropolis property. Because the desire to get Ms. Orbesood out of its hair was central to Landlord's decision to settle, Landlord's CEO instructs you to include in the settlement agreement the following provisions:
- Ms. Orbesood will not represent future claimants in ADA claims against Landlord;
- She will keep the fact, terms and amount of the settlement confidential;
- She will neither advertise the fact that she prosecuted an ADA suit against Landlord, nor use Landlord's name in any advertising or promotional materials;
- She will not solicit individuals with potential ADA accessibility or accommodation claims against Landlord, refer them to other counsel or share a fee with other counsel in connection with such claims; and
- She will return not only all confidential documents produced during the litigation pursuant to the terms of the existing protective order, but also all of her work product, which she will not use to aid any future claimants.
- In return, Landlord will pay Ms. Orbesood a premium above and beyond her legal fees, in addition to the settlement amount already agreed upon between the parties.
If Ms. Orbesood will not agree to these terms, Landlord's CEO suggests, as an alternative, that Landlord offer to retain Ms. Orbesood as a legal consultant. Landlord would pay her a monthly fee to be “on call” to advise it in connection with ADA-related compliance issues. The agreement would be memorialized in a separate retainer agreement entered after the settlement with her client is consummated. Ms. Orbesood would provide valuable insight to help Landlord minimize its exposure to future ADA lawsuits, and the arrangement would have the intended result of conflicting her out of taking any cases against Landlord in the future.
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A Lawyer's System for Active Reading
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.