Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
New York Court Finds Pre-nup Fails Under Laws of Both Spain and Dominican Republic
Although a couple's divorce was being handled by a New York court, their prenuptial agreement was governed by Spanish law (the place of its signing) or Dominican law (the place where the marriage took place), and in both jurisdictions the agreement was unenforceable for failure to follow local law. M. v. M., 309652/12 (July 2).
The wife moved to set aside the parties' prenuptial agreement, which they signed in 2001. The wife was born in the Dominican Republic and had Italian citizenship, while the husband was a citizen of Spain, where the agreement was signed. The agreement purported to govern the disposition of property in the event of marriage and divorce, but was silent as to choice of law. The parties married in the Dominican Republic in 2002, moved to New York in 2004, and separated in 2008.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.