Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Some 75 years after the adoption of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP), an overhaul is imminent and it will fundamentally affect product liability litigation practice. The proposed amendments are categorized into early, active, and sustained judicial case management; discovery practice addressing scope, proportionality, and sanctions; and cooperation by lawyers in an adversarial process. The article herein takes up the first two, in that order. The amendments involving cooperation between lawyers are much more modest.
This article explains the most important amendments. The focus is primarily on discovery, because that is the crux of so many product liability cases, and the discovery amendments are more far-reaching. The cases have involved unduly burdensome discovery, and skirmishes over sanctions that have troubled courts, practitioners and companies alike. They have struggled to sort through a morass of conflicting standards over the duties of preservation of evidence (especially electronically stored information, dubbed ESI), the standards for imposing discovery sanctions, and the severity of the sanctions. The amendments should alleviate these problems.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
A common question that commercial landlords and tenants face is which of them is responsible for a repair to the subject premises. These disputes often center on whether the repair is "structural" or "nonstructural."