Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
[Editor's Note: The tax credits that states have made available to attract film and TV productions have presented a challenging, changing landscape to producers, as individual states add or eliminate these credits, or adjust tax credits amounts that producers can obtain. The recent enactment of revisions to California's tax credit provisions has raised additional questions for producers. This article by Thomas D. Selz considers film-and-TV tax credits on a national basis and concludes with comments on the new California revisions. The article by Schuyler M. Moore in this issue focuses on the California changes.]
On Aug. 20, 2014, North Carolina, which had provided incentive payments of $61 million in 2013, voted to eliminate the 25% refundable tax credit for film-production shooting in the state. North Carolina House Speaker Pro Tem, Paul Stam was quoted in The Wall Street Journal as asking, “Why in the world should we be giving tax money to make movies?” By contrast, on Sept. 18, 2014, California passed and signed into law an expansion of its tax incentive film program, raising the annual available tax credits from $100 million to $330 million.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.