Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
This holiday shopping season, millions of Americans will look to their social media friends or favorite bloggers for advice when deciding which gifts to buy. And with over 42 million blog sites in the United States alone, there are plenty of “peer” opinions to consider. See, “State of the Blogging World” Infographic at Blogging.org. But are consumer-generated product-related reviews or commentary always the mere opinion of the person posting them, as many readers may believe? What if the company whose product is the subject of the review had, in fact, exerted such influence over the reviewer that it affected what was written, turning a seemingly personal post into something more akin to advertising?
There's no question that in today's consumer marketplace, digital “word-of-mouth” reviews are a major influence on the purchasing decision. This new reality was expressly recognized by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) when it released its updated Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in 2009 (the Guides), 16 C.F.R. '255. The FTC included examples in Guides that made it clear that the FTC believed its authority to regulate commercial speech extends into a consumer's personal posts when a certain type of quid pro quo relationship between the consumer and advertiser exists. In the opinion of the FTC, when a benefit from the advertiser is exchanged for a positive consumer review, that consumer's post should no longer be considered merely to be her personal opinion, but instead must be seen as an endorsement and an advertising message, and subject to '5 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. '45.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.