Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Will the Supreme Court Remove <i>Brulotte</i>'s Shadow Over Patent Licensing?
Fifty years ago, in Brulotte v. Thys Co., 379 U.S. 29 (1964), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the collection of royalties after a patent's expiration constitutes per se patent misuse. Although criticized by scholars, antitrust agencies and the lower courts, Brulotte has not only endured, it has impacted licensing practices in a number of contexts. See, Sean Gates & Jeny Maier, “Brulotte 's Continuing Shadow Over Patent Licensing'” 4 J. Intell. Prop. L. & Prac. 181 (2009). Brulottelooms large over the licensing of a single patent, packages of patents, patents combined with trade secrets, and patent applications.'See, e.g., Outman v. Western Contracting Corp., 204 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 289 (N.D. Iowa 1979); Phillips Screw Co. v. Amtel, Inc., 465 F. Supp. 3, 5, 7 (D. Mass. 1978); Veltman v. Nortel Simon, Inc., 425 F. Supp. 774, 775 (S.D.N.Y. 1977); Beckman Instruments, Inc. v. Technical Dev. Corp., 433 F.2d 55, 61 (7th Cir. 1970); Well Surveys, Inc. v. Perfo-Log, Inc., 396 F.2d 15 (10th Cir. 1968); Rocform Corp. v. Acitelli-Standard Concrete Wall, 367 F.2d 678 (6th Cir. 1966); Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Mestre, 701 F.2d 1365 (11th Cir. 1983); Baladevon, Inc. v. Abbott Labs., Inc., 871 F. Supp. 89 (D. Mass. 1994); Sanford Redmond, Inc. v. Mid-America Dairymen, Inc., 29 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1222 (S.D.N.Y. 1992); Veltman, 425 F. Supp. 774; Meehan v. PPG Indus., Inc., 802 F.2d 881 (7th Cir. 1986).'It has bedeviled licensing negotiations, voided freely negotiated contracts, and been used to reopen what were considered long-settled agreements. All that may change, however, because the Court ' contrary to the suggestion of the Solicitor General ' granted certiorari in Kimble v. Marvel Enterprises, Inc., No. 13-720 (cert. granted Dec. 12, 2014), to decide whether to overrule Brulotte.
Unless the Court leaves Brulotte undisturbed, the decision will certainly affect the licensing practices not only for agreements involving a single patent, but also for agreements involving patent applications, packages of patents, and packages of patents and other intellectual property rights. The outcome could allow for more flexible licensing structures, potentially ushering in an era of innovative licensing. Such a change may, however, come with more uncertainty about what practices constitute misuse. Kimble may therefore be a harbinger of significant change in the world of patent licensing.
The Long Line of Brulotte 's Critics
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Stranger to the Deed Rule
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.