Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
It is virtually a given in all but the smallest Chapter 11 bankruptcies that financial advisers and/or investment bankers will be retained to assist in the representation of the debtor or any official committee. Bankruptcy attorneys rely on the expertise and assistance of these other professionals in addressing virtually every issue that arises in a case, including debtor-in-possession financing, assumption and rejection of executory contracts and leases, formulation and confirmation of a plan of reorganization or liquidation, and selling some or substantially all of the debtor's assets under section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code. Indeed, bankruptcy attorneys will provide legal advice to their clients based, at least in part, on the information and opinions obtained from other court-appointed non-attorney professionals. Consequently, a successful Chapter 11 representation requires a close working relationship between the client's attorneys and non-attorney professionals, and the latter are generally kept fully abreast of the attorney's strategies on behalf of their common client.
Many bankruptcy attorneys assume that otherwise privileged communications that are shared with non-attorney professionals are privileged, or that the disclosure of such privileged information in the presence of non-attorney professionals will not result in the waiver of any applicable privilege. However, where a communication otherwise protected by the attorney-client privilege is disclosed to, or made in the presence of a third party, the communication may no longer be, or deemed never to have been considered privileged. See, e.g., Westinghouse Elec. Corp. v. Republic of Philippines, 951 F.2d 1414, 1424 (3d Cir. 1991) (“voluntary disclosure to a third party of purportedly privileged communications has long been considered inconsistent with an assertion of the privilege.”). This raises significant issues in the bankruptcy context, where bankruptcy attorneys regularly exchange information with other court-appointed professionals who are not their clients or employees of their law firms.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.