Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Storing and sharing data “in the cloud” has become, in many instances, a business necessity. The practical and economic advantages of cloud computing are clear ' it eliminates the need to send client data via traditional, costly methods, and is significantly less expensive than building and maintaining the same data storage capacity in-house.
Despite its obvious benefits, counsel must consider whether client data stored in the cloud is safe, not just from hackers, but from the inadvertent waiver of the attorney client privilege. Fine print in cloud providers' Privacy Policies and Terms of Service (ToS) authorizing third parties to access information may jeopardize the privileged status of documents stored in the cloud. Ambiguous case law, expansive and vague provider policies, and uncertainty surrounding the attorney client privilege in the context of evolving technology, require that counsel exercise due diligence and follow best practices to ensure that the attorney client privilege is protected when sharing information via cloud-based services.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.