Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Bankruptcy StrategistLJN NewslettersNewsSections

All's Well That Ends Wellness:

By Steven B. Smith

For four years, there was no clarity, only questions. I am referring, of course, to those glaring questions left unanswered by the United States Supreme Court's decision in Stern v. Marshall, 564 U.S. 2, 131 S.Ct. 2594 (2011), which caused untold sleepless nights, ruined family vacations, and created marital strife. Questions such as, what if bankruptcy litigants consented to the bankruptcy court's adjudication of Stern claims? Would that cure the Article III violation? And, if litigants could consent, would the consent need to be express, or would implied consent be sufficient? And what about the question of whether bankruptcy judges would ever again be allowed to enter a final judgment in any avoidance action?

Four long years and then all was well, or Wellness, to be precise. In May 2015, the Supreme Court once again weighed in on the issue of bankruptcy court adjudication of Stern claims and provided us with a measure of clarity in its recent opinion, Wellness International Network, Ltd., et al. v. Sharif, 135 S. Ct. 1932 (2015). This article explores the background leading up to the Wellness decision, the facts and the holding of the Supreme Court's decision, and the aftermath of the decision.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers Image

There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

When Is a Repair Structural or Nonstructural Under a Commercial Lease? Image

A common question that commercial landlords and tenants face is which of them is responsible for a repair to the subject premises. These disputes often center on whether the repair is "structural" or "nonstructural."