Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Traditional or tangible chattel paper has long been used to finance equipment purchases. One of the significant benefits bestowed upon chattel paper financers is the ability to perfect a security interest via possession, and in so doing potentially achieve priority over pre-existing secured lenders who perfected by filing a UCC Financing Statement. This system generally worked well, and trillions of dollars have been financed in this manner.
In 1999, provisions of Article 9 of the UCC relating to secured lending were updated to permit the creation of “electronic chattel paper.” Electronic chattel paper is essentially chattel paper evidenced by records existing electronically (i.e., a file on a computer). It is distinguished from tangible chattel paper in that electronic chattel paper is not actually paper at all. Electronic chattel paper also is not tangible chattel paper merely executed via electronic signatures or tangible chattel paper converted to electronic form via a facsimile machine or scanner. Instead, and as explained in more detail below, electronic chattel paper is data that memorializes the original record of a financing transaction and that exists and is stored in a secure electronic medium.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.