Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Components of Transactions for Acquiring Professional Sports Teams

By Jared F. Bartie, Daniel A. Etna and Irwin A. Kishner
November 30, 2015

Sports team acquisitions have garnered headlines over the past few years, with several recent team prices ranging in the billions of dollars. Since 2000, the top five U.S. team sales were at prices in excess of the billion dollar threshold, the highest being the $2 billion sale of the NBA's Los Angeles Clippers in 2014 and the $2 billion sale of MLB's Los Angeles Dodgers in 2011. In New York, the NFL's Buffalo Bills were purchased in 2014 for $1.4 billion. Not long ago, sports franchises were run like small businesses, with any net profit generated being an additional, but not always expected, benefit. Today, given rising acquisition costs and the lucrative revenue opportunities teams offer, they are run as sophisticated enterprises with the purpose of yielding profit for their well-heeled investors.

On the surface, the buying and selling of a professional sports team may seem like a regular M&A transaction. However, the many issues unique to the sports industry give these deals complicated twists that require extensive due diligence and the guidance of experienced counsel well-versed in a number of areas specific to the sports landscape. Potential team buyers and sellers need to be able to navigate the transaction process under the watchful eyes of respective leagues and governing bodies, while negotiating a plethora of business and legal issues.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability Image

This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.