Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Businesses regularly lose precious data, sometimes even “the crown jewels,” through trade secret theft by departing employees, unscrupulous contractors and others. Although trade secret theft is estimated to cause billions of dollars in damage every year, no federal civil claim for trade secret misappropriation currently exists. Despite the fact that patents, trademarks and copyrights are protected by federal laws creating private rights of action, trade secrets ' which for many businesses are the lifeblood of their revenue ' are not. State laws govern these assets, and they are inconsistently applied. Relief may be in sight.
On July 29, 2015, the Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2015 (DTSA) was introduced in the House of Representatives (H.R. 3326) and Senate (S. 1890). The Act would establish a federal civil cause of action for trade secret misappropriation, enabling plaintiffs to assert trade secret claims in federal district courts. While similar legislation has been introduced in previous years, there are reasons to think that the bill could pass in some form this Congress given the bipartisan support the measure enjoys.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
As consumers continue to shift purchasing and consumption habits in the aftermath of the pandemic, manufacturers are increasingly reliant on third-party logistics and warehousing to ensure their products timely reach the market.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.