Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Businesses regularly lose precious data, sometimes even “the crown jewels,” through trade secret theft by departing employees, unscrupulous contractors and others. Although trade secret theft is estimated to cause billions of dollars in damage every year, no federal civil claim for trade secret misappropriation currently exists. Despite the fact that patents, trademarks and copyrights are protected by federal laws creating private rights of action, trade secrets ' which for many businesses are the lifeblood of their revenue ' are not. State laws govern these assets, and they are inconsistently applied. Relief may be in sight.
On July 29, 2015, the Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2015 (DTSA) was introduced in the House of Representatives (H.R. 3326) and Senate (S. 1890). The Act would establish a federal civil cause of action for trade secret misappropriation, enabling plaintiffs to assert trade secret claims in federal district courts. While similar legislation has been introduced in previous years, there are reasons to think that the bill could pass in some form this Congress given the bipartisan support the measure enjoys.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.