Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Corporate CounselorKickerFeaturesTopicsCommercial LawSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

Internal-Use Software

By Manuel Garcia-Linares and George L. Metcalfe, Jr.
November 30, 2015

The tax credit for research and development (R&D) of internal-use software under Section 41 of the Internal Revenue Code has been the subject of many concerns regarding the current tax code. The R&D tax credit has been renewed 16 times since its implementation in 1981. The most recent renewal occurred on Dec. 19, 2014, when President Obama signed into law the Tax Increase Prevention Act, which called for a one-year extension of the tax credit and applied it retroactively from Jan. 1, 2014, until Dec. 31, 2014. Currently, the R&D tax credit has not been extended beyond calendar year 2015.

Many business leaders and commentators have called for this tax credit to become permanent. They argue that the temporary status of the credit has had two main effects. First, companies have faced a tremendous amount of uncertainty in calculating the after-tax cost of their R&D investments, and often have to commit to these investments long before they know whether the credit will be extended. Second, the credit has gotten lumped in with a wide variety of other tax provisions, including an important provision on Medicare reimbursement that expires on a regular basis.

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys Image

Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.

A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.