Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Anecdotal evidence suggests that a once common cross-examination technique ' impeachment with so-called “learned treatises” ' may be passing out of favor. If so, the trend should be reversed. Using a learned treatise on an opposing expert is, at a minimum, an effective and efficient way to undermine his or her credibility. And in the right hands, cross-examination using a learned treatise can also build affirmative evidence supporting the cross-examiner's case-in-chief.
The technique is rooted in Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) 803(18), the hearsay exception for “learned treatises, periodicals, or pamphlets.” The rule provides: “A statement contained in a treatise, periodical, or pamphlet [is useable as evidence] if:
(A) the statement is called to the attention of an expert witness on cross-examination or relied on by the expert on direct examination; and
(B) the publication is established as a reliable authority by the expert's admission or testimony, by another expert's testimony, or by judicial notice.”
One recent commentator, who will go unnamed, summed up application of FRE 803(18) this way: “Most commonly, medical literature is used in cross-examination of an outside medical expert hired to provide expert opinion and testimony' . An expert may be cross-examined by the use of a learned treatise if he/she admits that the treatise is a recognized and standard authority on the subject involved.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Social media is going through its teenage years. Moody, unpredictable, deeply self-aware — yet brimming with potential. For businesses and law firms, this moment is an invitation — not an identity crisis. It’s a chance to reassess how we show up.
The question this year: How should (or could) law firms be using AI as the technology stands today?
The legal industry is having a moment in the media spotlight. For lawyers and firms, and their marketing professionals, now is the time to up their go-to-market efforts.
Many law firms, especially small and midsize practices, struggle with their marketing and business development efforts. Often, they turn to traditional solutions, such as hiring a marketing coordinator, hoping this role can create meaningful impact. However, without a robust game plan, the outcome often becomes reactive, administrative marketing work, sidelining efforts to establish the firm’s unique positioning and visibility. A fractional CMO offers an alternative.