Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Federal Circuit continued its largely deferential treatment of Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) procedural rulings in Redline Detection, LLC v. Star Envirotech, Inc., 15-1047 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 31, 2015), upholding the PTAB's denial of Petitioner Redline's motion to submit supplemental evidence under 37 C.F.R. '42.123(a), within a one-month window from institution of an inter partes review (IPR). The Federal Circuit also affirmed the PTAB holding that U.S. Pat. No. 6,526,808 (the '808 Patent), was not invalid as obvious under 35 U.S.C. '103. Practitioners should be aware that entry of supplemental evidence after institution of an IPR is not routine, even within the one-month window from institution of the IPR, and remains firmly up to the PTAB's broad discretion.
Procedural Background
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
This article reviews the fundamental underpinnings of the concept of insurable interest, and certain recent cases that have grappled with the scope of insurable interest and have articulated a more meaningful application of the concept to claims under first-party property policies.