Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Ah, the good old days. When the America Invents Act (AIA; http://1.usa.gov/19AoMZ2) was being pushed through Congress in 2011, proponents of the proposed changes expounded on the virtues of a system that mirrored the patent practices of the majority of the industrialized world. The switch to a “first to file” system, the introduction of more robust U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) methodologies for challenging the validity of issued patents, and the changes to the fundamental statues governing novelty and obviousness were all supposed to provide an enhanced degree of certainty for businesses in their patent portfolio. Instead, the unforeseen consequences of both the AIA and the seminal 2014 Supreme Court decision in Alice v. CLS Bank (Alice), 573 U.S. ___, 134 S. Ct. 2347 (2014), have created a hostile environment for patent portfolios, which has negative implications for investment in innovation and startups.
It is axiomatic in commerce that money will follow opportunity, which is evidenced by the expanding use of the inter partes review process that was introduced in the AIA. Originally, the IPR process under the AIA was introduced to establish a faster and less expensive way to confirm the validity of a patent. It was anticipated that IPRs would be used to help eliminate weak patents that were being asserted by patent challengers, including the much maligned non-practicing entities (“patent trolls”). Those who challenge on the basis of a patent of uncertain scope would rather assume the risk of losing in a timely and efficient USPTO administrative proceeding, than to face losing in a federal court after spending a small fortune.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.