Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Intellectual Property StrategistKickerFeaturesTopicsCommercial LawLitigationSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

Into the Dark: Patent Trend Post America Invents Act and <i>Alice</i>

By Kean J. DeCarlo

Ah, the good old days. When the America Invents Act (AIA; http://1.usa.gov/19AoMZ2) was being pushed through Congress in 2011, proponents of the proposed changes expounded on the virtues of a system that mirrored the patent practices of the majority of the industrialized world. The switch to a “first to file” system, the introduction of more robust U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) methodologies for challenging the validity of issued patents, and the changes to the fundamental statues governing novelty and obviousness were all supposed to provide an enhanced degree of certainty for businesses in their patent portfolio. Instead, the unforeseen consequences of both the AIA and the seminal 2014 Supreme Court decision in Alice v. CLS Bank (Alice), 573 U.S. ___, 134 S. Ct. 2347 (2014), have created a hostile environment for patent portfolios, which has negative implications for investment in innovation and startups.

It is axiomatic in commerce that money will follow opportunity, which is evidenced by the expanding use of the inter partes review process that was introduced in the AIA. Originally, the IPR process under the AIA was introduced to establish a faster and less expensive way to confirm the validity of a patent. It was anticipated that IPRs would be used to help eliminate weak patents that were being asserted by patent challengers, including the much maligned non-practicing entities (“patent trolls”). Those who challenge on the basis of a patent of uncertain scope would rather assume the risk of losing in a timely and efficient USPTO administrative proceeding, than to face losing in a federal court after spending a small fortune.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers Image

There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Transfer Tax Implications on Real Property Leases Image

The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.