Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
One of the most significant early decisions attorneys make when deciding to hang out a shingle is what type of entity would be best for their practice. Choosing the right entity is a must. The right legal structure can save taxes, minimize legal exposure and avert costly business hassles. But is the right choice for yesterday still the right one for today? Federal, state and local laws are constantly changing. The Internal Revenue Code is especially in flux. Two recent pieces of Federal legislation, the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (ATRA), Public Law 112-240, and the Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA), each contains countless tax provisions which drastically change the backdrop against which entity choice decisions are made. Some recent United States Tax Court rulings have also changed the entity choice calculus.
This article addresses the topic of entity choice for law practices in light of recent federal tax law changes. First, it summarizes recent federal tax law changes that should be considered by attorneys choosing an entity. Next, it highlights distinctive features of entities, popular with law firms, impacted by the changes. Analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of the various entities follows.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
Executives have access to some of the company's most sensitive information, and they're increasingly being targeted by hackers looking to steal company secrets or to perpetrate cybercrimes.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?