Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A “bank [making a secured rescue loan] had information that should have created the requisite suspicion ' to conduct a diligent search for possible dirt” ' i.e., whether the debtor had the right to pledge $312 million of customer securities, held the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit on Jan. 8, 2016. In re Sentinel Management Group, Inc., 2016 WL 98601, at *2 (7th Cir. Jan. 8, 2016) ["Sentinel V "].
The Seventh Circuit reversed the district court, voided the defendant bank's lien as a fraudulent transfer, and rejected the bank's good-faith defense. Based on the district court's detailed findings of inquiry notice, the Seventh Circuit stressed that “the bank had lent approximately $300 million to a company that had capital equal to roughly 1/150th of that amount” at a time when the debtor was mysteriously “able to secure the entire loan.” Id. at *3. Because the “obvious” source of the collateral “was the [debtor's] customer accounts,” and because “the bank had ' documents [showing] on even a casual perusal ' that [the debtor] lacked authority to pledge” the assets, the bank “was on inquiry notice that the assets ' had been fraudulently” pledged to it. Id. at *6.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
A common question that commercial landlords and tenants face is which of them is responsible for a repair to the subject premises. These disputes often center on whether the repair is "structural" or "nonstructural."