Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Organized and meaningful data has been leveraged in progressive organizations for years, but now that data and information is highly accessible and easily consumable via the ever-expanding digital mesh, enterprise-level expectations and related legal business impact have been elevated. With this new reality come many questions: What data should we collect? What needs to be measured? By whom? And, how can metrics and key performance indicators (KPIs) not only affect change but provide a common communication and measurement base for firms, their clients, and technology suppliers alike?
Recently, myself (Director of Information at Keesal, Young & Logan (KYL)) and Peter Zver (Tikit North America's President), had the opportunity to present a business information “measure to manage”-themed educational panel session as part of ALM's 12th Annual Law Firm Chief Information & Technology Officer's Forum (CIO Forum). Our panelists, including industry pundit and founder of Procertas Casey Flaherty, Google's head of legal operations Mary O'Carroll, and Tikit's customer value engineer Ryan Steadman, discussed how to best organize and use data in ways that are useful to attorneys, firms, and clients, while promoting positive behavioral change that impacts the bottom line and client relationships. Specifically, we drilled down into real world 'measure to manage' examples including time data, system utilization, technology proficiency, client KPIs and pricing.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.