Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Med Mal Jury Verdicts in PA Hit 15-Year Low
According to statistics recently published by the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts (AOPC), 2015 saw the state's fewest medical malpractice jury verdicts in 15 years. For example, in the years 2000 to 2003, the average number of medical malpractice verdicts was 326, while in 2015 only 101 medical malpractice verdicts were returned. Of these latter decisions, only 22 went to the plaintiff side. The slide in med-mal verdicts may be attributable to the rising costs of litigation in Pennsylvania, which have prompted many potential litigants to opt for mediation or arbitration as an alternative to the court system. In addition, some, such as plaintiff attorney John P. Gismondi, feel that the Medical Care Availability and Reduction of Error Act's (MCARE) requirement of expert certification prior to the filing of a suit has reduced the number of frivolous lawsuits, leaving behind only the stronger cases. “They tend to be, as a group, better cases than what existed in the system 10 years ago,” Gismondi said.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.