Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Business Crimes BulletinKickerFeaturesSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

Recent Guidance Regarding Deduction of Fines

By David E. Kahen and Elliot Pisem
August 01, 2016

Internal Revenue Code section 162(f), which relates to fines and penalties that would otherwise constitute ordinary and necessary expenses deductible under Code ' 162(a), provides: “No deduction shall be allowed under subsection (a) for any fine or similar penalty paid to a government for the violation of any law.” The provision was added to the Code in 1969 as a codification of prior case law, under which certain such expenses were held nondeductible because allowing a deduction would be inconsistent with public policy. See H. Rep. No. 91-782 (1969), at 331; Tank Truck Rentals v. Commissioner, 356 U.S. 30 (1958).

The controversies that continue to arise under ' 162(f) are illustrated by two memoranda released within the past few months that address whether an amount paid to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and representing a disgorgement of profits from activities undertaken in violation of law is a “fine or similar penalty,” or whether it is compensatory in nature and therefore not subject to disallowance under ' 162(f). These memoranda also address whether the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) ' a self-regulatory organization with federally mandated duties under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (1934 Act) ' is a “corporation or other entity serving as an agency or instrumentality of” the federal government within the meaning of the regulations interpreting 162(f) (Reg. ' 1.162-21(a)(3)), such that an amount paid to FINRA should be treated as an amount paid to a government for purposes of this provision.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Law Firms are Reducing Redundant Real Estate by Bringing Support Services Back to the Office Image

A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.

Bit Parts Image

Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights

Risks of “Baseball Arbitration” in Resolving Real Estate Disputes Image

“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.

Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel Image

'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.